Bigger Penis Pills Are Usually Fake – Here Are The Facts

February 1, 2010 by admin · Leave a Comment 

It has a lot in advertising in recent years has been that promise a bigger penis for every man who uses it. Some of these interesting items to go so far as to say that a man can both inches in width and length of their penis to win.
Before you go out to buy one of these guaranteed to make your penis larger products, you should be aware of some of the facts:

The FDA has never approved any pill, product, or device that has been proven to increase your penis size. Part of this could be brushed off due to the lack of detailed studies of such products, but for the most part nobody has tried to go through the full FDA approval process because that would mean these products become regulated (meaning the government would cut into the profits).
There has been some scientific research performed on various penis extender devices, which work by stretching the muscles of your penis strategically to increase its size. These devices so far are the only clinically-proven products that can make your penis bigger.
There has been no research whatsoever into the accuracy of penis pills, oils, creams, or other products that you simply ingest or apply to your penis. That should tell you right there that 99% of these types of products do not work, as it has not been proven in a controlled and measured environment.
Pills, oils, creams, and other make your penis larger with no work and see instant results consumable products cost about a dollar to produce (because they are essentially packed with cheap herbs or sugar or other filler-type material), yet they are going to charge you upwards of $1200 for them. So you are essentially paying a markup of $1190 on a product that probably do not work.

Now that you tried to find out whether these products do, especially when the fact that almost all of them fakes can be examined. To be honest, almost any product you want, enter a larger penis will not work and may even be some unpleasant side effects.
If you're really looking for products that will give you a bigger penis set, you really need to do your research – check the source of a variety of products, whether you are interested in on-line (either a client review, better business Bureau, Health Forum, etc.). Thus, if several sources to tell you that a specific product to work the way you the opportunity to not only the decline in sales on a Web site for the court in writing more.

IRAP’s Accelerated Review Process (For projects under $50,000)

January 8, 2010 by admin · Leave a Comment 

National Research Council of Canada, the Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC is, IRAP) through, helping small and medium enterprises in Canada to support the development and commercialization of small technologies. They recently, employees of 500 small-scale projects are under implementation for early evaluation process aimed at companies with people. They can be $ 50,000 in this program is to provide the funds. Activities for technology includes a wide range of business and market-oriented projects.
While IRAP is a federal organization, each provincial office tailors its approach to suit local conditions so the types of project supported and funds available may vary in your region. The following is a list of example projects in Ontario: Small R&D project limited in scope and nature Assessment of technology needs for adoption of technology Lean manufacturing/productivity studies Technical feasibility studies Design: product design, engineering design, design for manufacture Prototype engineering Engineering process analysis Productivity enhancement studies Development of business, sales and marketing plans and image creation (branding) Development of e-commerce enabled website (or upgrading website) Development of international strategies Development of supply chain strategies Competitive market research and competitive intelligence studies Feasibility studies / assessment for new service and product venture Financial / corporate restructure for improved growth potential (e.g. investor readiness) Intellectual Property (IP) assessment, planning and strategy assistance First patent application (not CIPs nor other country fillings) Licensing and commercialization strategy Research and technology evaluation-related travel and expenses Diagnostics (business or technical) Other projects not entirely technical in nature
Kingsford Consulting can assist business planning, market research and strategy development services, which could be addressed by NRC-IRAP offers financing. Please note that, to the approval for public financing of consulting services, a number of requirements and regulations will go through each application and business needs through a formal application.
Feel free to contact us if you would like to learn more.
Published in May 2009.
http://kingsfordconsulting.ca/?p=187

Designing your eCommerce site

November 12, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

In a recent article I talked about Google AdSense placement based on eye-tracking research. However, research by The Poynter Institute, Eye tools and the Estlow Center for Journalism and New Media has a lot to say about more than where to put an AdSense block.

Designing an eCommerce site is more than making it pretty. You have certain desired actions you’re looking for from your visitors. You have specific things you want to be sure they see and hopefully act on. Now, there’s some research that can guide your design. Certainly you want your site to look professional, but you want it to do its job as effectively as possible too.

People are surprisingly alike in some of their basic visual behavior. It’s been argued that our evolution as hunter-gatherers has shaped much of our ingrained visual patterns. Whether you buy that particular argument or not there are still important commonalities.

Typical behavior on initially viewing a site is to do a fast scan of the entire visible screen with short focusing periods around the areas that attract attention. First pass tends to include headlines, the page logo, photo captions, subheads, links and menu items. And the big hot spot is the upper left corner of the screen. I haven’t seen any definitive research on whether these patterns also hold for users with native languages that read any way except left to right, but I’m assuming most of you are building sites for left-to-right readers.

The clear message is that your most important real estate is in that upper left area and that the lower right (particularly if it’s below the fold) is the least likely to receive much attention.

How you use your words in a headline, paragraph or link can make a huge difference in your success at capturing a visitor’s attention. The concept is called frontloading. Wherever you can make sure your critical terms appear at the very beginning of headlines, links and other text. It’s still got to make sense, but the first few words are far more likely to be at least scanned then the middle or end of a headline or link or the inside of a paragraph.

The exact same words can have drastically different capture rates depending on their order. You want to maximize the probability that the visitor will read a whole headline or link and then act on it. So put the most significant, enticing words first – the ones that are the best grabbers and convey the subject immediately.

You don’t have a lot of time to mess about. It’s been reported that a typical surfer may be off your page in well under 14 seconds unless something grabs his or her attention fast. Remember the upper-left? You want to do an especially good job with headlines, link and text in that area.

Dropcaps (where the first capitalized letter in a line is in a different, often unusual, font and extends below the normal text base-line), bolding, font changes and color changes can also serve as strong eye-attractors. If you try these techniques you need to be careful that you don’t overuse them (your page will look like a mess), and it’s extremely important that you test whether or not they’re actually doing what you want. Annoying as it may be, running tests is the only way to make sure it’s an improvement.

Do you use lists? Have you made sure that they’re in-line and as close to the left margin as possible? Don’t ever use an outline format with multiple indents. People scan down, not across and they tend to scan close to the left margin. Indent too much and it might as well be invisible.

An interesting testing result that I read somewhere said that somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of site visitors don’t even see centered headlines. Sure they look nice and a lot of sites use them, but if they’re totally missed by even 3 percent of your visitors, you’re paying a major price to look good. Suggestion? Put those headlines up against your left margin.

This also applies to links. Put those links up against the left margin, not inside a paragraph, centered or off to the right. And if you want any clicks on a link, never put it in that nearly unseen lower right area. Might as well just leave it off your page.

How about indented paragraphs? Now there’s a great way to start an argument. Some argue that it attracts the eye, it’s different, few sites use it so you stand out. Others insist that you’re far better off staying left justified and frontloading each paragraph. There’s only one way to resolve it for yourself, yeah, run some tests and see what works with your visitors on your site.

The bottom line is that once you get beyond the basics of placement, frontloading, and left-justified links and headlines, you need to test if you want to fully maximize the effectiveness of your website design. I wish there were a simpler answer too, but in the end only testing will tell you what works best for your site

In a recent article I talked about Google AdSense placement based on eye-tracking research. However, research by The Poynter Institute, Eye tools and the Estlow Center for Journalism and New Media has a lot to say about more than where to put an AdSense block.

Find A New MLM

August 15, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

Just like in any profitable market industry, there are people looking to get rich quick who will say or do just about anything to make that happen. That is the case with some MLM programs too. There are MLM companies where the founders are shady, dishonest, and prey on the good intentions of new MLM distributors. As a new MLM’er there are a few things that can aid you in your search for a reputable company.

1) Reputation Is Key

Reputation is everything in the business world. MLM companies have definite reputations within MLM communities. You need to take the time needed to do enough research to know that the program you are wanting to promote is legitimate. Pay attention to what people are writing on blogs and chatting about online. While there will always be something negative about every company available for review, you will definitely be able to tell the good from the bad companies. A good website to aid in your search is www.mlmwatchdog.com.

2) Check Out The Newer Companies

If you find a long standing reputable company, you can be assured that the company will be reliable and a potentially profitable endeavor. On the flip side, if you only research by program longevity, you could miss out on a potentially great new MLM program. There are ways to protect yourself if you’re interested in a newly established MLM company. It will require more vigilant work on your part though to maintain your safety.

The founders should be carefully scrutinized as to their previous business holdings, reputation with those business dealings, and all of their related credentials. The companies plan for customer support is also essential to the success of any new company. If the company plans on handling large volumes of new distributors, then a customer support call center needs to be put into place. A live person for people to talk to, not just an automated system. The research available on the new company of interest should be morally and ethically sound. If the company is promising too much or looks like they are only surviving on hype, then it’s probably not a company to join. Watch out for companies promising too much.

3) Know The Compensation Plan

Along with being reputable, the company should also have income potential. The compensation plan should be at least, if not better, than other industry leaders. Research other companies with the same or similar comp plans to evaluate income potential.

There is no way to predict that you will be satisfied and be able to make money with any program. There are way too many unknowns to predict what your outcome will be. However, with some diligent research, you can safe guard yourself from a potentially bad situation. MLM is a legitimate business model, but it is all too easy to fall into the glitz, glamor, and hype of a program before making sure that the facts support the program’s claims. Looking for a new MLM should be done with all of the scrutiny, objectivity, and due diligence as a brick and mortar business.