Investing in Your Home: Will I see a return on my investment?

September 9, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

With the housing market in a record slump, one of the biggest questions I get from people is how much is too much to spend on a renovation and will I see that money back when I go to sell my house?

While it is a common belief that any money you put into your house will add value to it, this is not always the case. There are really two different reasons that people invest money into their home- General Maintenance/Upkeep and Visual Improvements.

1) General Maintenance- Projects like replacing your hot water heater, patching a leaky roof, repairing damaged siding, or sealing up cracks in the foundation are not going to show you a return on your investment but they are going to be required to keep up the overall condition of your home.

Regular maintenance can help extend the life of your home but at some point there are things that are going to be replaced. By avoiding repairs or maintenance on items like this will just make the condition worse and will result in even more money being needed for repairs

2) Visual Improvements- While that sounds very vague, this would be anything that is not structural in nature or not necessarily required. This is where investing money into your house is going to pay off. Projects like renovating a bathroom or a kitchen, finishing off a basement, adding a deck, or even landscaping the yard will not only spruce up your home but they will also add value

That being said, not all of these projects will yield the same return. For the same amount of money, finishing off a basement might yield a 20% return on your investment while renovating your kitchen or bathroom could yield a 75-90% return on your investment.

Even though the rule thumb says that you will see a return on your investment by renovating a kitchen or bathroom, or by finishing off a basement, that is not always the case. If you are planning on selling your home in the immediate future or down the road, putting too many personal touches on a space can actually have a negative affect.

The same thing can be said for spending too much on a given space. If the average kitchen in your neighbor is estimated at $25,000 in value and you spend $60,000 on your kitchen, odds are you will have a hard time convincing buyers that the house is worth that much more than your neighbors.

Adding additional bedrooms or an extra bathroom is always a good investment provided it is not taking space away from other usable space. Be careful when taking usable space to create two spaces. Sometimes taking a bedroom and cutting it in half will actually take value away from the house if it wasn?t big enough to start with. It is always a good idea to have a real estate agent give you some advice as to the impact a renovation will have on the value of your home.

By investing wisely, you can see some significant returns on your investment, whether it is a more comfortable living space for years to come or a more attractive home for potential homebuyers.

Austin is Forbes Magazine’s #1!

September 8, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

Why isn’t Forbes magazine moving it’s business to Austin? Forbes says its #1 in America! It’s got beautiful scenery, great recreational choices, a healthy realty market and a slick city attitude. And, as if anyone needed confirmation, Forbes magazine has now ranked Austin in the top three of each of its three ‘best in America’ categories.

Forbes magazine is considered by many to be America’s #1 magazine for business, stocks, finance, lifestyle, technology and much more. When they compiled their 2008 rankings of ‘Best Places for Business and Careers’ this year, they slightly expanded their criteria to include certain other qualities of each area analyzed.

This is where Austin scored and all the facets of the survey contributed to Austin being the # 1of all America, in this category. When taking all aspects into account, income and job growth were still ranked first, but the analysis was expanded to include the whole business atmosphere.

Forbes reportedly gave special attention to the cost of doing business in the cities analyzed. This included the price of office space, labor, taxes and energy. The analysis not only explored the realizable pool of labor, but also investigated the quality and qualifications of the available pool of labor.

The rankings also calculated social characteristics which would make the region more attractive, such as crime rates, housing costs and net migration.

Austin came up as number one! Of course, in Austin this is no surprise, but it is still a feather in the cap to be recognized as the number one nationwide in the revered Forbes magazine.

One of the many reasons given for this ranking is attributed to the University of Texas. Each year the University enrolls close to 50,000 students and 25% of these enroll in graduate and professional degree programs. This results in the available labor pool being supplied with top notch college grads, many with Ph.D. s.

The other two surveys, in which Austin came in second and third would also have helped to contribute to the number one ranking in ‘Best Places For Business and Careers’.

Austin came in at #2 for job growth and at #3 in the ‘Best Cities for Jobs’ ratings. Austin ranks third in the country for net migration; the figures for migration into Austin are quoted as 2.7% per year.

All these factors also contribute to elevating the allure of the Austin housing market, which is named as one of the few in the country predicted to rise in the next two years.

This was reported in a survey compiled by Private Mortgage Insurers, which dammed many areas into an 80% chance of realty decline, whilst analyzing Austin as having less than a one per cent chance.

All these indicators point to Austin as being amongst the best places to live and work in the United States; looks like the secret is out!

Stop Trading Individual Shares If You’re Not Beating The Market

September 7, 2009 by admin · Leave a Comment 

Every share investor enjoys hunting out profitable companies they can invest in, and hopefully finding a potential ten-bagger that will make them rich, but there comes a time when you have to analyze your portfolio and make harsh decisions if you’re not beating the overall market.

After all what is the point in spending hours and hours researching different companies if the end result is that you are underperforming the overall market. You may as well just invest in a tracker fund that tracks the market or a top performing mutual fund and spend your time doing more worthwhile things.

I know it can be quite exciting doing your own research and investing in the companies of your choice, but professionals are paid to do the same job and will generally have access to more information than you do, and can make better informed decisions.

So take a look at your share portfolio over the years and see how it’s performed in percentage terms. Then compare this to the performance of the FTSE 100, for example (or the Dow Jones if investing in US shares) and see how you compare.

If you find that the overall index has seriously outperformed your own efforts then something is seriously wrong here, and it might be an idea to seriously rethink your investment strategy.

For instance, taking the FTSE 100 as an example, this index has increased dramatically since 2003 almost doubling in value so almost all good quality companies will have risen a lot during this time. Now look at the companies you’ve been investing in. If they haven’t risen during this time when the market as a whole has been extremely bullish, then your investment strategy is seriously flawed.

If however, you have achieved excellent gains in percentage terms then your individual share picking strategy is of course justified, although it might still be an idea to place your money in a tracker or mutual fund, depending on your performance.

This isn’t always true though, because it’s important to note that portfolio managers have more constraints placed on them in terms of the types of companies they can invest in, plus of course there’s the added fees you have to pay for their service, so ultimately it’s a matter of choice and convenience.

I personally have done extremely well investing in my own portfolio over the years and have plenty of time to do my own research. However for people who have busy lives and have maybe shown that they are not that successful in managing their own portfolio and selecting individual companies to invest in, then paying someone else to do it for you is probably the better option.